My9s
Creative Commons License
This exhibit has not been peer reviewed.  [Return to Group]  [Printer-friendly Page] 

The Fear of Industrial Revolution: Machines in Dickens’ Hard Times

jung8129

Introduction

    Published in 1854, in the midst of the Industrial Revolution, Charles Dicken’s Hard Times describes the devastating effects of mechanization within the urban factories. Dickens suggests in Hard Times that British citizens, specifically the lower classes, were becoming dehumanized as a result of the Industrial Revolution. This dehumanization can be seen through Gradgrind’s and Bounderby’s attempts to suppress the expression of emotions and imagination within the factory, the school and the home.

Mechanization Within the Factory

    The description of the workers at Bounderby’s factory demonstrates how machine-like they have become. Coketown is described as being “inhabited by people equally like one another, who all went in and out at the same hours, with the same sound upon the same pavements, to do the same work and to whom every day was the same as yesterday and tomorrow, and every year the counterpart of the last and the next” (27-28). By describing the actions of Coketown workers as monotonous and repetitive, Dickens calls to mind the involuntary movements of machines. The repetition of the word “same” within the passage emphasizes the repetition that occurs within Coketown and the factories. Dickens goes on to explain that “these attributes of Coketown were in the main inseparable from the work by which it was sustained” (28). Dickens makes a point of using the word “inseparable” to explain how essential the factories were to the city. Coketown did not merely contain factories, it was itself a factory. The work being performed in Coketown’s factory, and by extension Coketown itself, was gradually being mechanized. By comparing the entire city to a factory that was becoming mechanized, Dickens is suggesting that the components of the city, the people, were becoming mechanized as well.

    The way that Bounderby treats the workers defines them as replaceable objects. He refers to the factory workers as a large group, rather than individuals. Bounderby believes that he is above the workers of the factory and treats them poorly because of this. He calls them “pests of the earth” and “you people” when talking to Blackpool about the unionization of the factory workers (144, 147). The workers are so objectified that when organizing themselves, they can no longer conceive of their own human individuality. Bounderby refuses to acknowledge that the factory workers are people of value, but instead separates them from himself. The workers can no longer imagine themselves as separate entities, because they have been consistently treated as “hands” rather than as individuals (66). By calling the workers “hands” Dickens illustrates how the factory workers are only seen as a part of the machine, only a part of the system, rather than individuals.

    Blackpool is used throughout the book as a metonym for the factory; he is internal to the factory. We first see him “standing in the street, with the odd sensation upon him which the stoppage of the machinery always produced – the sensation of its having worked and stopped in his own head” (66, 67). Dickens uses Blackpool to make it clear that there is no way out for the factory workers, “an idea that Dickens ironically illustrates by having Stephen leave Coketown only to fall into an abandoned mine pit, called the Old Hell Shaft, just on the outskirts of town” (Johnson, 228).
Picture
Factories loom over the countryside
Penguin Classics Book Cover, 2003

Mechanization Within the Household

    Dickens makes it clear early on in Hard Times that both the Gradgrind children and the factory Hands have been affected by the Industrial Revolution. The narrator contemplates:

Is it possible, I wonder, that there was any analogy between the case of the Coketown population and the case of the little Gradgrinds? … That there was any Fancy in them demanding to be brought into healthy existence instead of struggling on in convulsions? That exactly in the ratio as they worked long and monotonously, the craving grew within them for some physical relief – some relaxation, encouraging good humor and good spirits, and giving them a vent – some recognized holiday…? (30).

Dickens is suggesting through this connection with the Gradgrind children and the factory workers that the children are also turning into machines. By stripping them of their imagination and instilling them with the facts of the world, Gradgrind has forced them into the same monotonous and machine-like existence that the factory workers are forced to endure. Gradgrind even calls Sissy “girl number twenty,” completely ignoring Sissy’s sense of self. He has changed her from a child into a mechanized component of his system, the same way a part contributes to the functioning of the entire machine (10).

    In the climax of the novel, Louisa finally rejects her father’s teachings and becomes fully human for the first time. Instead of the harsh industrial language associated with education and the factory, here Louisa’s speech is filled with natural allusions:

Would you have doomed me, at any time, to other frost and blight that have hardened and spoiled me? Would you have robbed me – for no one’s enrichment – only for the greater desolation of this world – of the immaterial part of my life, the spring and summer of my belief, my refuge from what is sordid and bad in the real things around me, my school in which I should have learned to be more humble and more trusting with them, and to hope in my sphere to make them better? […] With a hunger and thirst upon me, father, which have never been for a moment appeased; with an ardent impulse towards some region where rules, and figures, and definitions were not quite absolute; I have grown up, battling every inch of my way (209, 210).

Louisa uses the words “frost and blight” to describe the way Gradgrind has raised her and uses “spring and summer” to describe her belief. The former are words associated with calculating harshness while the latter are associated with the natural world and a lack of mechanization. She goes on to use the words “touch,” “hunger,” and “thirst” which are all sensations that machines are incapable of. Louisa is ultimately unhappy with how she was brought up and how her life has turned out and she blames this on how she was taught to be a machine.
Picture
Thomas Gradgrind apprehends his children Louisa and Tom at the circus
Harry French, Wood engraving, 1870s

Conclusion

    Dickens does not give a clear solution to the problem of industrialization that society was facing at the time. He shows the circus as an alternative to the factories and he shows how children’s education is vital to how they will one day act in society, but he does not “offer a programmatic solution to the ugly snarl of Coketown; a program, after all, is simply more Fact. Instead he calls for a radical reorganization, by each of us, of our own lives, de-emphasizing schedule and machine, fostering the legitimate human instinct for relaxation, good humor, and creativity” (Danzig, 197). British society at the time was concerned about the dehumanization taking place throughout the country. In his novel, Hard Times, Dickens acknowledges these fears, but does not offer any concrete solutions that would have eased his reader’s minds.
Picture
Row houses emphasize the lack of identity felt in Hard Times
Gustav Dore, Over London by Rail, 1870
Works Cited

Danzig, Allan. The Theme of the Machine. Dubuque, Iowa: WM. C. Brown Company, 1969. Print.
Dickens, Charles. Hard Times. London: Penguin, 2003. Print.
Johnson, Patricia E. "Hard Times and the Structure of Industrialism: The Novel as Factory." Trans. Array Critical Insights: Charles Dickens. Pasadena: Salem Press, 2011. Print.